spacer
home
spacer
cases
spacer
services
spacer
forms
spacer
faqs
spacer
glossary
spacer
articles
spacer
newsletter
spacer
about us
spacer
contacts
spacer
banner
FEATURED CASE

ECONOMIST QUANTIFIES LOSS OF LOVE, CARE, COMFORT & SOCIETY IN WRONGFUL DEATH OF 75-YEAR-OLD WIDOWER - JURY VERDICT $1,600,000


Jury awards verdict of $1,600,000 for the death of 75-year-old widower; no minor children; loss of Human Value of Life testimony and LIFE ACTIVITY CALENDAR admitted into evidence.

Robert W. Johnson & Associates was retained to (a) present economic testimony that would help the jury quantify the loss of love, care, comfort, society, etc., to the surviving adult children and (b) prepare a LIFE ACTIVITY CALENDAR, admitted through lay testimony, that would graphically show the close family relationship which had existed.

Location: Youngstown, Ohio

Case: Ponzi v. City of Youngstown, Youngstown, Ohio

Court: Mahoning County Court, No. 87 cv 1413

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: H.A. DiBlasio & Associates, by H.A. DiBlasio, Youngstown, Ohio

Case Synopsis: Mr. Joseph Bucik, a 75-year-old widower, was struck and killed by an unmarked police car driven by a police officer who was shown to have a 0.125 blood alcohol level.

Mr. Bucik had been an extremely active 75-year-old. He had recently won the local mixed doubles bowling tournament and a senior golf championship tournament. He enjoyed gardening and spent every holiday with his children. Mr. Bucik's married adult children sued for the loss of their father's love, care, comfort, society, etc.

Expert Testimony: Robert W. Johnson testified that, based on federal government studies and accepted economic analysis, the dollar value range for a human value or "non-economic" value of life is from $1,600,000 to $8,500,000. These numbers are independent of life expectancy adjustment and are considered appropriate compensation by the federal government for compensation of non-financial losses such as love, care, comfort, society, consortium, etc.

Attorney Comments: "You did a great job. This case had significant problems, limited pecuniary damages and a plaintiff with a less than 10-year life expectancy, yet you were able to convey significant economic concepts and large numbers to the jury in an easily understandable manner; thus having a dramatic impact on opposing counsel's cross examination."

Results: The defense never made a settlement offer and asked the jury for a defense verdict. The jury returned a verdict of $1,600,000 for the loss of Mr. Bucik's love, care, comfort, society, and funeral expenses.

For More Information....

Wrongful Death Cases:

  • Economist's Testimony Assists Redwood City Jury in Awarding in Wrongful Death of Laborer. Read More...
  • Economist's Testimony Assists Jury Against Hyundai Motor Company. Read More...
  • Economist Quantifies Damages in Farmer Wrongful Death. Read More...
  • Economist Testimony Assists Jury in Wrongful Death Case of Young Physician. Read More...
  • Appellate Court Affirms Economist's Testimony on Love, Care, Comfort and Society in Wrongful Death of 19-year-old. Read More...
  • Economist's Testimony Assists in Wrongful Death of 38-year-old Mother. Read More...
  • Appellate Court Finds that Economist's Testimony on Love, Care, Comfort and Society is Sufficient to Support Verdict in Wrongful Death of Emotionally Disturbed 10-year-old. Read More...
Related Services:
  • Wage Loss Valuation ... Read More
  • Life Activity Calendar ... Read More
  • Quantifying the Loss of Care, Comfort, and Society ... Read More
Order Services Now:
  • Wage Loss, Wrongful Death Valuation Form... Order Now
  • Life Activity Calendar, Wrongful Death Checklist... Order Now
  • Loss of Human Value of Life, Wrongful Death Valuation... Order Now