Robert W. Johnson & Associates was retained to: (a) present economic testimony that would help the jury quantify the plaintiff’s impaired earnings capacity and (b) calculate the cost of future medical expenses.
Location: Santa Maria, California
Case: Pratte v. Central California Church of God Association, et al.
Court: Santa Barbara County California Superior Court, No. SM90197
Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Attorney Richard C. Brenneman, Chern & Brenneman, Santa Maria, California.
Case Synopsis: Ms. Rebekka Pratte, a 14-year-old high school track athlete, was a teen volunteer at a spring cleanup of a church-owned campground. After arrival at the campground, the camp staff instructed an adult supervisor to transport the teens to their sleeping quarters at the camp dining hall. It was during this transportation that an adult supervisor slammed the door of the church van’s door on Rebekka’s hand.
The nerve damage spread from her hand to her whole body. Rebekka developed Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) in all her extremities including osteoporosis, contractures, extreme sensitivity to pain, including any touch, change in temperature, etc. Unfortunately, physical therapy aggravated her condition causing uncontrollable involuntary muscle spasms. Multiple stellate ganglion blocks were unsuccessful in either stopping the pain or preventing the spread of the RSD. She never competed in track after the accident.
Future treatments may include the implantation of a morphine pump into her spinal canal for pain control and multiple sympathectomies. Rebekka finished high school, but has been unable to finish college. She’s dependent upon a wheelchair due to her disabling condition.
Trial Presentation: Robert W. Johnson, testified that: (1) assuming that Rebekka had completed college, the present cash value of her lifetime earnings capacity would have been $2,200,000 (including the value of lost household services); (2) based on the life care plan of Edward Bennett, the present cash value of her future medical expenses would be $14,400,000; and (3) the defense economist’s analysis had several fatal incorrect assumptions including a work-life so short that Rebekka would not be eligible for any social security payments, an overly aggressive discount rate and a fringe benefit rate that was less than the national average.